Optimization of Electrospinning Parameters for Lower Molecular Weight Polymers: A Case Study on Polyvinylpyrrolidone

Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) is a synthetic polymer that holds significance in various fields such as biomedical, medical, and electronics, due to its biocompatibility and exceptional dielectric properties. Electrospinning is the most commonly used tool to fabricate fibers because of its convenience and the wide choice of parameter optimization. Various parameters, including solution molarity, flow rate, voltage, needle gauge, and needle-to-collector distance, can be optimized to obtain the desired morphology of the fibers. Although PVP is commercially available in various molecular weights, PVP with a molecular weight of 130,000 g/mol is generally considered to be the easiest PVP to fabricate fibers with minimal challenges. However, the fiber diameter in this case is usually in the micron regime, which limits the utilization of PVP fibers in fields that require fiber diameters in the nano regime. Generally, PVP with a lower molecular weight, such as 10,000 g/mol and 55,000 g/mol, is known to present challenges in fiber preparation. In the current study, parameter optimization for PVP possessing molecular weights of 10,000 g/mol and 55,000 g/mol was carried out to obtain nanofibers. The electrospinning technique was utilized for fiber fabrication by optimizing the above-mentioned parameters. SEM analysis was performed to analyze the fiber morphology, and quantitative analysis was performed to correlate the effect of parameters on the fiber morphology. This research study will lead to various applications, such as drug encapsulation for sustained drug release and nanoparticles/nanotubes encapsulation for microwave absorption applications.


Introduction
The electrospinning technique is a versatile method for fabricating fibers from a broad range of polymers.This process offers a wide array of controllable parameters, including flow rate (measured in mL/h), applied voltage (kV), needle gauge (G), and the distance between the needle tip and the collector (cm), as depicted in Figure 1's schematic of the electrospinning setup.
To begin electrospinning, a polymer solution is loaded into a syringe (connected to a metal needle), which is then set to a specific flow rate.The needle is connected to a direct current (DC) voltage supply that applies a high voltage, while the collector is grounded at a designated distance from the needle tip.Upon applying the voltage, a phenomenon to form the Taylor cone occurs, generating a fine fiber jet that propels toward the grounded collector.The careful manipulation of these process parameters allows for the customization of fiber morphology to meet specific application needs.The formation of the Taylor cone is crucial for successful fiber production.Therefore, optimizing the electrospinning parameters, in To begin electrospinning, a polymer solution is loaded into a syringe (connected to a metal needle), which is then set to a specific flow rate.The needle is connected to a direct current (DC) voltage supply that applies a high voltage, while the collector is grounded at a designated distance from the needle tip.Upon applying the voltage, a phenomenon to form the Taylor cone occurs, generating a fine fiber jet that propels toward the grounded collector.The careful manipulation of these process parameters allows for the customization of fiber morphology to meet specific application needs.The formation of the Taylor cone is crucial for successful fiber production.Therefore, optimizing the electrospinning parameters, in conjunction with the intrinsic properties of the polymer solution-such as its volatility, viscosity, and conductivity-is essential.These properties not only influence the ability to form a Taylor cone but also affect the fiber morphology [1].
Ambient conditions, including temperature and humidity, also play a significant role in determining fiber morphology.The choice of solvent for the polymer solution impacts its volatility; this is particularly important in biomedical applications like drug delivery, where a non-volatile solution may be detrimental [2][3][4].Additionally, the molecular weight (Mw) of the polymer and the concentration of the polymer in the solution are key factors that govern the degree of polymer chain entanglement, which in turn affects the solution's viscosity and the quality of the electrospun fibers [5].
The fabrication of fibers relies on the equilibrium of forces resulting from surface tension, the concentration of charges on the jet, and the viscosity of the solution.The viscosity (η) and molecular weight of the polymer are directly related, and their relationship is expressed in the form of the Mark-Houwink Equation [6,7] [ ] = • where α and K are constants for a given polymer, solvent, and temperature.
Surface tension causes the liquid jet to transform into one or multiple spherical droplets in order to minimize surface area due to Rayleigh instability [8].On the other hand, the electrostatic repulsion between charges on the jet counteracts this effect and promotes an increase in surface area, leading to the creation of a thin jet.The viscoelastic forces present in a polymer solution also play a vital role in bead-free fiber fabrication, as they prevent changes in shape and help create fibers.By adjusting the interplay between Ambient conditions, including temperature and humidity, also play a significant role in determining fiber morphology.The choice of solvent for the polymer solution impacts its volatility; this is particularly important in biomedical applications like drug delivery, where a non-volatile solution may be detrimental [2][3][4].Additionally, the molecular weight (Mw) of the polymer and the concentration of the polymer in the solution are key factors that govern the degree of polymer chain entanglement, which in turn affects the solution's viscosity and the quality of the electrospun fibers [5].
The fabrication of fibers relies on the equilibrium of forces resulting from surface tension, the concentration of charges on the jet, and the viscosity of the solution.The viscosity (η) and molecular weight of the polymer are directly related, and their relationship is expressed in the form of the Mark-Houwink Equation [6,7] [η] = K•M α v where α and K are constants for a given polymer, solvent, and temperature.
Surface tension causes the liquid jet to transform into one or multiple spherical droplets in order to minimize surface area due to Rayleigh instability [8].On the other hand, the electrostatic repulsion between charges on the jet counteracts this effect and promotes an increase in surface area, leading to the creation of a thin jet.The viscoelastic forces present in a polymer solution also play a vital role in bead-free fiber fabrication, as they prevent changes in shape and help create fibers.By adjusting the interplay between these forces, various fiber structures can be produced.For instance, by strengthening the impact of viscoelastic and charge repulsion forces compared to surface tension, it is possible to prevent the formation of beads.While the impact of solution concentration on fiber structure is widely known, it is the alteration in solution viscosity that ultimately leads to changes in the morphology of electrospun fibers [9].
Electrospinning fibers from polymers with lower molecular weights (M w ) presents significant challenges due to the inherent physical properties of these materials.Highmolecular-weight polymers are typically favored in electrospinning because they offer the necessary chain entanglement that facilitates fiber formation.In contrast, when using polymers with lower M w , the surface tension of the polymer solution often exceeds its viscoelastic forces.This imbalance results in the formation of beads along the fibers, which is an undesirable outcome.Beads within the fiber structure can significantly impair the mechanical integrity and functional performance of the resultant fiber mat, as they act as sites of structural weakness and/or defects.To mitigate this issue and achieve a uniform, beadless fiber morphology, careful optimization of electrospinning parameters is essential.This includes adjusting the solution concentration, as well as the electrospinning voltage, flow rate, and distance between the needle and collector.Achieving the optimal set of conditions is crucial to produce defect-free electrospun fibers, which is vital for their application in fields where high performance and consistency of physical properties are imperative.
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) is a versatile synthetic polymer, denoted by the molecular formula (C 6 H 9 NO) n .The ball-and-stick model presented in Figure 2 illustrates the molecular composition of PVP.This polymer has been extensively combined with materials such as titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ), Titanium nitride (TiN), and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to explore its potential in sensing technologies [10][11][12].The biocompatibility and nontoxicity of PVP also make it a popular choice in the field of drug delivery systems [13,14].
fiber structure is widely known, it is the alteration in solution viscosity that ultimately leads to changes in the morphology of electrospun fibers [9].
Electrospinning fibers from polymers with lower molecular weights (Mw) presents significant challenges due to the inherent physical properties of these materials.Highmolecular-weight polymers are typically favored in electrospinning because they offer the necessary chain entanglement that facilitates fiber formation.In contrast, when using polymers with lower Mw, the surface tension of the polymer solution often exceeds its viscoelastic forces.This imbalance results in the formation of beads along the fibers, which is an undesirable outcome.Beads within the fiber structure can significantly impair the mechanical integrity and functional performance of the resultant fiber mat, as they act as sites of structural weakness and/or defects.To mitigate this issue and achieve a uniform, beadless fiber morphology, careful optimization of electrospinning parameters is essential.This includes adjusting the solution concentration, as well as the electrospinning voltage, flow rate, and distance between the needle and collector.Achieving the optimal set of conditions is crucial to produce defect-free electrospun fibers, which is vital for their application in fields where high performance and consistency of physical properties are imperative.
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) is a versatile synthetic polymer, denoted by the molecular formula (C6H9NO)n.The ball-and-stick model presented in Figure 2 illustrates the molecular composition of PVP.This polymer has been extensively combined with materials such as titanium dioxide (TiO2), Titanium nitride (TiN), and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to explore its potential in sensing technologies [10][11][12].The biocompatibility and nontoxicity of PVP also make it a popular choice in the field of drug delivery systems [13,14].Commercially, PVP is available in a spectrum of molecular weights (Mw), but it is commonly utilized at Mw ≥ 130,000 g/mol for various applications.Recent research has highlighted how different electrospinning parameters affect the morphology of PVP fibers, with these studies typically using a molecular weight of 130,000 g/mol as a standard Commercially, PVP is available in a spectrum of molecular weights (M w ), but it is commonly utilized at M w ≥ 130,000 g/mol for various applications.Recent research has highlighted how different electrospinning parameters affect the morphology of PVP fibers, with these studies typically using a molecular weight of 130,000 g/mol as a standard [15][16][17][18][19].However, there is a noticeable gap in the literature regarding the systematic exploration of electrospun PVP fibers at lower molecular weights.
Addressing this research gap could reveal significant insights into the fundamentals of electrospinning PVP.By tailoring the solution concentration (expressed in weight percent, wt%) for lower molecular weights, it may be possible to produce thinner fibers.These finer fibers can have the potential to enhance performance across a range of applications due to their increased surface area and unique physical properties.Therefore, further investigation into the optimization of electrospinning parameters for PVP with lower molecular weights is not only warranted but could also open new avenues for material innovation.
In bridging the current knowledge gap, this study offers a significant exploration of the electrospinning process using lower molecular weight Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) variants, specifically 10,000 and 55,000 g/mol.Through careful optimization of the solution concentration (wt%) and electrospinning parameters, we have successfully fabricated uniform electrospun fibers.Additionally, this study provides insight into the effects of needle gauge size and the distance from the needle tip to the collector (NCD) on the fiber morphology.Our findings elucidate crucial electrospinning process parameters that markedly influence fiber fabrication, particularly for polymers with lower molecular weights.This research not only advances our fundamental understanding of electrospinning dynamics but also paves the way for innovative applications of fine-tuned nanofibrous materials.

Materials
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) possessing M w 10,000 g/mol and 55,000 g/mol, as well as solvent Ethanol (purity 99.9%), were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) to carry out the experimental work.
2.2.Parameter Optimization for PVP (M w ~10,000 g/mol and 55,000 g/mol) Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) exhibits solubility in a wide range of organic solvents as well as deionized water.In this study, ethanol was employed as a solvent for the preparation of the PVP polymer solution.This choice was made due to the higher evaporation rate of the PVP solution at ambient temperature.Polymer solutions of PVP with varying molecular weights were formulated at concentrations of 10 wt%, 30 wt%, and 50 wt%.It is noteworthy that wt% denotes the ratio of the mass of PVP to the mass of ethanol × 100.To ensure uniformity, the solutions underwent magnetic stirring for one hour at room temperature.Subsequently, the solutions were loaded into a 10 mL syringe connected to a flow meter/syringe pump (1000-US/SyringeONE, New Era Pump Systems Inc., Farmingdale, NY, USA) for the electrospinning process.The process parameters utilized for electrospinning are detailed in Table 1.Flow rate (mL/h) 0.5, 1.0 (both flow rates at each voltage) 0.5, 1.0 (both flow rates at each voltage) 0.5, 1.0 (both flow rates at each)

Effect of Variation in Needle Gauge and Needle Tip-to-Collector Distance
In this phase of the experimental investigation, a consistent flow rate of 0.5 mL/h and an applied voltage of 20 kV were maintained for all samples.The 25G needle, with an inner diameter (ID) of 0.260 mm, was substituted with a 22G needle (ID~0.413mm), while the distance between the needle and collector was adjusted within the range of 12-16 cm.Spinning solutions of 80 wt% PVP 10000 and 50 wt% PVP 55000 were employed for the experimental procedures.The deposition duration for each sample was controlled within an interval of 5-10 min.Electrospinning parameters used in this part of the experimental work are tabulated in Table 2.

Characterization
The morphology of the samples was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (Zeiss Merlin).ImageJ software (https://imagej.net/ij/)was utilized to estimate the fiber diameter from SEM images, with 40 fibers examined for each sample to investigate the impact of process parameters on morphology.The diameter distribution of all samples was further analyzed using OriginPro 2024.

Results and Discussion
The results section will be subdivided into three parts, discussing the parameter optimization for PVP 10000 and PVP 55000 , as well as the effect of variation in needle gauge and NCD.

Parameter Optimization for PVP 10000
In the electrospinning experiments conducted at room temperature, three PVP 10000 solutions with concentrations of 10 wt%, 30 wt%, and 50 wt% were utilized, adhering to the process parameters delineated in the experimental section.Subsequent SEM analysis was performed on the derived samples.As depicted in Figure S1, the samples generated from the 10 wt% solution did not yield fibers; instead, particle formation was observed across all tested voltages and flow rates.This outcome is attributed to the low polymer concentration, which is hypothesized to increase the surface tension and reduce the solution's viscosity, thereby inhibiting the elongation necessary for fiber formation.Further investigation into the relationship between polymer concentration, surface tension, and viscosity is warranted to substantiate this hypothesis and refine the electrospinning process parameters for low-concentration solutions.
The concentration of PVP 10000 was increased to 30 wt% and 50 wt%.While fibers tended to form, particle formation was significantly higher than fibers.These results indicate that increasing the polymer concentration leads to an increase in the viscosity and viscoelasticity of the solution.This increase overcomes the surface tension of the solution, allowing fiber fabrication to occur.SEM micrographs of these samples are shown in Figures 3 and 4.
Higher concentrations of PVP 10000 increased the viscosity of the spinning solution, but the spinnability remained low.In the 30 wt% solution, fibers tended to form at a higher flow rate of 1.0 mL/h at 20 kV (Figure 3).However, with the 50 wt% spinning solution, a lower flow rate of 0.5 mL/h showed a higher fiber density (Figure 4).
Particle density remained high for all voltages at both flow rates, prompting an increase in PVP 10000 concentration to 70 wt%.Figure 5 illustrates SEM micrographs and their respective fiber diameter distribution curves.
Considering the increase in fiber density at a lower flow rate for the 50 wt% spinning solution, electrospinning of the 70 wt% spinning solution was conducted at 0.5 mL/h, with other process parameters unchanged.This solution exhibited a higher fiber density and lower bead density.Increasing the voltage reduced bead formation, but it was not raised above 25 kV to prevent instability of the Taylor cone [20] and to ensure a uniform fiber diameter distribution.Analysis of fiber diameter distribution revealed that higher voltages resulted in smaller average fiber diameters.The average diameter of all samples was below 0.300 µm, indicating enhanced uniformity with increasing voltage.The better uniformity of the fiber diameter depicted the stabilization of the Taylor cone at higher voltages, which led to uniform stretching of the fiber jet.Average diameters were observed Polymers 2024, 16, 1217 6 of 15 to be 0.270 ± 0.086 µm, 0.233 ± 0.079 µm, and 0.255 ± 0.063 µm for 15 kV, 20 kV, and 25 kV applied voltages, respectively.The decrease in fiber diameter at 20 kV suggests that the higher charge density assisted in stretching the fiber jet.However, at 25 kV, the fiber diameter tends to increase, which is attributed to higher solution ejection from the needle tip due to increased applied voltage [21].No particle formation was observed for these samples at any voltage.Moreover, the higher PVP 10000 concentration led to increased viscoelasticity and spinnability of the solution.Higher concentrations of PVP10000 increased the viscosity of the spinning solution, but the spinnability remained low.In the 30 wt% solution, fibers tended to form at a higher flow rate of 1.0 mL/h at 20 kV (Figure 3).However, with the 50 wt% spinning solution, a lower flow rate of 0.5 mL/h showed a higher fiber density (Figure 4).Particle density remained high for all voltages at both flow rates, prompting an increase in PVP10000 concentration to 70 wt%.Figure 5 illustrates SEM micrographs and their respective fiber diameter distribution curves.Higher concentrations of PVP10000 increased the viscosity of the spinning solution, but the spinnability remained low.In the 30 wt% solution, fibers tended to form at a higher flow rate of 1.0 mL/h at 20 kV (Figure 3).However, with the 50 wt% spinning solution, a lower flow rate of 0.5 mL/h showed a higher fiber density (Figure 4).Particle density remained high for all voltages at both flow rates, prompting an increase in PVP10000 concentration to 70 wt%.Figure 5 illustrates SEM micrographs and their respective fiber diameter distribution curves.To completely avoid bead formation, the PVP 10000 concentration was increased to 80 wt%.SEM results revealed no bead formation for any of these samples (Figure 6).Considering the increase in fiber density at a lower flow rate for the 50 wt% spinning solution, electrospinning of the 70 wt% spinning solution was conducted at 0.5 mL/h, with other process parameters unchanged.This solution exhibited a higher fiber density and lower bead density.Increasing the voltage reduced bead formation, but it was not raised above 25 kV to prevent instability of the Taylor cone [20] and to ensure a uniform fiber diameter distribution.Analysis of fiber diameter distribution revealed that higher voltages resulted in smaller average fiber diameters.The average diameter of all samples was below 0.300 µm, indicating enhanced uniformity with increasing voltage.The be er uniformity of the fiber diameter depicted the stabilization of the Taylor cone at higher voltages, which led to uniform stretching of the fiber jet.Average diameters were observed to be 0.270 ± 0.086 µm, 0.233 ± 0.079 µm, and 0.255 ± 0.063 µm for 15 kV, 20 kV, and 25 kV applied voltages, respectively.The decrease in fiber diameter at 20 kV suggests that the higher charge density assisted in stretching the fiber jet.However, at 25 kV, the fiber diameter tends to increase, which is a ributed to higher solution ejection from the needle tip due to increased applied voltage [21].No particle formation was observed for these samples at any voltage.Moreover, the higher PVP10000 concentration led to increased viscoelasticity and spinnability of the solution.
To completely avoid bead formation, the PVP10000 concentration was increased to 80 wt%.SEM results revealed no bead formation for any of these samples (Figure 6).This solution concentration (80 wt%) was opted to be the optimized wt% for PVP 10000 .The surface tension was completely overcome by the viscoelastic forces, which as a result produced fibers with fine morphology and no bead formation [22].The fiber diameter was observed to decrease at 20 kV as compared to 15 kV; however, at 25 kV, it tended to increase.The increase in the average fiber diameter at a higher voltage is attributed to an increase in polymer solution extraction.It is worth mentioning that the increase in concentration from 70 wt% to 80 wt% led to an increase in the average fiber diameters at all applied voltages.Average diameters were 0.370 ± 0.111 µm, 0.245 ± 0.083 µm, and 0.330 ± 0.129 µm for 15 kV, 20 kV, and 25 kV.The diameter distribution was observed to be uniform at 20 kV for both 70 wt% and 80 wt% concentrations.It was also concluded from these results that the fiber diameter tends to increase at higher polymer concentrations.No bead formation was observed for the 80 wt% PVP 10000 concentration.Therefore, the optimized parameters to prepare bead-free fibers using PVP 10000 were found to be 80 wt% concentration, 0.5 mL/h, and 20 kV applied voltage for 14 cm and 25G needle.This solution concentration (80 wt%) was opted to be the optimized wt% for PVP The surface tension was completely overcome by the viscoelastic forces, which as a re produced fibers with fine morphology and no bead formation [22].The fiber diameter observed to decrease at 20 kV as compared to 15 kV; however, at 25 kV, it tende increase.The increase in the average fiber diameter at a higher voltage is a ributed t increase in polymer solution extraction.It is worth mentioning that the increas concentration from 70 wt% to 80 wt% led to an increase in the average fiber diamete all applied voltages.Average diameters were 0.370 ± 0.111 µm, 0.245 ± 0.083 µm, and 0 ± 0.129 µm for 15 kV, 20 kV, and 25 kV.The diameter distribution was observed t uniform at 20 kV for both 70 wt% and 80 wt% concentrations.It was also concluded f these results that the fiber diameter tends to increase at higher polymer concentrat No bead formation was observed for the 80 wt% PVP10000 concentration.Therefore optimized parameters to prepare bead-free fibers using PVP10000 were found to be 80 concentration, 0.5 mL/h, and 20 kV applied voltage for 14 cm and 25G needle.

Parameter Optimization for PVP55000
As previously mentioned, spinning solutions with concentrations of 10 wt%, 30 w and 50 wt% were prepared using PVP55000.The representative SEM micrographs for th wt% PVP55000 concentration are displayed in Figure S2.No fiber formation was obse at any voltage or flow rate for this concentration due to the very low viscosity of solution.In Figure 7, SEM micrographs of samples prepared using a 30 wt% PVP solution at 15 kV, 20 kV, and 25 kV, with flow rates ranging from 0.5 mL/h to 1.0 mL/h shown.

Parameter Optimization for PVP 55000
As previously mentioned, spinning solutions with concentrations of 10 wt%, 30 wt%, and 50 wt% were prepared using PVP 55000 .The representative SEM micrographs for the 10 wt% PVP 55000 concentration are displayed in Figure S2.No fiber formation was observed at any voltage or flow rate for this concentration due to the very low viscosity of the solution.In Figure 7, SEM micrographs of samples prepared using a 30 wt% PVP 55000 solution at 15 kV, 20 kV, and 25 kV, with flow rates ranging from 0.5 mL/h to 1.0 mL/h, are shown.Compared to the 10 wt% PVP10000 solution, these samples exhibited fiber fabrication; however, the particle density was still notably high in both cases.The fiber density for the 30 wt% PVP55000 solution was highest at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/h and 20 kV.Upon increasing the concentration to 50 wt%, a smooth fiber morphology was observed at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/h, as depicted in Figure 8.Compared to the 10 wt% PVP 10000 solution, these samples exhibited fiber fabrication; however, the particle density was still notably high in both cases.The fiber density for the 30 wt% PVP 55000 solution was highest at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/h and 20 kV.Upon increasing the concentration to 50 wt%, a smooth fiber morphology was observed at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/h, as depicted in Figure 8.Compared to the 10 wt% PVP10000 solution, these samples exhibited fiber fabrication; however, the particle density was still notably high in both cases.The fiber density for the 30 wt% PVP55000 solution was highest at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/h and 20 kV.Upon increasing the concentration to 50 wt%, a smooth fiber morphology was observed at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/h, as depicted in Figure 8. Bead formation was observed at lower voltages (15 kV) but not at higher voltages.The average fiber diameters for a flow rate of 0.5 mL/h were found to be 0.398 ± 0.122 µm, 0.380 ± 0.089 µm, and 0.410 ± 0.118 µm for applied voltages of 15 kV, 20 kV, and 25 kV, respectively.
To understand the effect of flow rate on fiber morphology, the flow rate was increased from 0.5 mL/h to 1.0 mL/h.Figure 9 shows the SEM micrographs and their corresponding diameter distributions for these samples.
The diameter of the fibers exhibited an increase when subjected to a higher flow rate of 1.0 mL/h at 15 kV, resulting in a measurement of 0.513 ± 0.175 µm.Additionally, the occurrence of bead formation was noted at the higher flow rate.The elevated flow rate causes the generation of larger droplets at the needle tip, with the charge applied to the droplets being insufficient to counteract the surface tension, thereby leading to the formation of beads.It tended to decrease at 20 kV applied voltage and increase at 25 kV (Figure 10).To understand the effect of flow rate on fiber morphology, the flow rate was increased from 0.5 mL/h to 1.0 mL/h.Figure 9 shows the SEM micrographs and their corresponding diameter distributions for these samples.The diameter of the fibers exhibited an increase when subjected to a higher flow rate of 1.0 mL/h at 15 kV, resulting in a measurement of 0.513 ± 0.175 µm.Additionally, the occurrence of bead formation was noted at the higher flow rate.The elevated flow rate causes the generation of larger droplets at the needle tip, with the charge applied to the droplets being insufficient to counteract the surface tension, thereby leading to the formation of beads.It tended to decrease at 20 kV applied voltage and increase at 25 kV (Figure 10). .Graphical representation for the effect of flow rate on average fiber diameter; samples prepared using 50 wt% PVP55000, 14 cm NCD, and 25G needle.
The increase in polymer solution extraction at 25 kV, combined with a higher flow rate, resulted in greater bead formation at the higher voltage.Additionally, the diameter distribution was observed to increase with the flow rate.The optimized parameters for PVP55000 fiber fabrication were determined to be 50 wt% polymer concentration, 0.5 mL/h flow rate, and 20 kV applied voltage for 14 cm NCD and 25gauge needle.
Considering the SEM analysis of the fibers prepared by spinning 50 wt% solutions of both PVP10000 and PVP55000, it is concluded that a higher molecular weight significantly The increase in polymer solution extraction at 25 kV, combined with a higher flow rate, resulted in greater bead formation at the higher voltage.Additionally, the diameter distribution was observed to increase with the flow rate.The optimized parameters for PVP 55000 fiber fabrication were determined to be 50 wt% polymer concentration, 0.5 mL/h flow rate, and 20 kV applied voltage for 14 cm NCD and 25 gauge needle.
Considering the SEM analysis of the fibers prepared by spinning 50 wt% solutions of both PVP 10000 and PVP 55000 , it is concluded that a higher molecular weight significantly assisted in fiber fabrication.A molecular weight of 55,000 g/mol exceeds the critical entanglement molecular weight (generally in the range of 10,000-20,000 g/mol), which drastically increases the viscosity of the solution.Hence, fiber formation is observed for 50 wt% PVP 55000 ; however, same is not true for PVP 10000 [23].However, increasing the concentration also leads to an increase in entanglement [24]; therefore, 70 wt% and 80 wt% PVP 10000 exhibited fiber fabrication, as previously discussed.The fiber diameter of the samples prepared using 50 wt% PVP 55000 was still higher.From detailed diameter analysis, it was also revealed that the higher molecular weight (55,000 g/mol in this case) assisted in the fabrication of fibers with higher diameters, even at lower concentrations.Figure 11 illustrates the fiber diameter plots at different concentrations of PVP 10000 (70 wt% and 80 wt%) and PVP 55000 (50 wt%).
The increase in polymer solution extraction at 25 kV, combined with a higher flow rate, resulted in greater bead formation at the higher voltage.Additionally, the diameter distribution was observed to increase with the flow rate.The optimized parameters for PVP55000 fiber fabrication were determined to be 50 wt% polymer concentration, 0.5 mL/h flow rate, and 20 kV applied voltage for 14 cm NCD and 25gauge needle.
Considering the SEM analysis of the fibers prepared by spinning 50 wt% solutions of both PVP10000 and PVP55000, it is concluded that a higher molecular weight significantly assisted in fiber fabrication.A molecular weight of 55,000 g/mol exceeds the critical entanglement molecular weight (generally in the range of 10,000-20,000 g/mol), which drastically increases the viscosity of the solution.Hence, fiber formation is observed for 50 wt% PVP55000; however, same is not true for PVP10000 [23].However, increasing the concentration also leads to an increase in entanglement [24]; therefore, 70 wt% and 80 wt% PVP10000 exhibited fiber fabrication, as previously discussed.The fiber diameter of the samples prepared using 50 wt% PVP55000 was still higher.From detailed diameter analysis, it was also revealed that the higher molecular weight (55,000 g/mol in this case) assisted in the fabrication of fibers with higher diameters, even at lower concentrations.Figure 11 illustrates the fiber diameter plots at different concentrations of PVP10000 (70 wt% and 80 wt%) and PVP55000 (50 wt%).

Effect of Needle Gauge and NCD
As mentioned earlier, the needle gauge was changed to 22G for optimized electrospinning process parameters (deduced from the results discussed above) and solution concentrations of 80 wt% PVP 10000 and 50 wt% PVP 55000 .The needle tip-to-collector distance (NCD) was varied between 12 cm and 16 cm to observe the variation in fiber morphology.
Figure 12 shows the SEM images and their corresponding diameter distributions for the samples prepared using 80 wt% PVP 10000 at three NCDs (12 cm, 14 cm, and 16 cm) at 20 kV and 0.5 mL/h, using a 22G needle.
Average diameters were observed to be 0.349 ± 0.118 µm, 0.297 ± 0.089 µm, and 0.341 ± 0.091 µm for 12 cm, 14 cm, and 16 cm NCD, respectively.It was observed that by increasing the distance from 12 cm to 14 cm, the fiber diameter tended to decrease.This trend is associated with the stretching of the fiber jet for longer NCD, which led to the decrease in the fiber diameter.However, at 16 cm, the fiber diameter increased to 0.341 ± 0.091 µm, indicating that the electrostatic force due to the applied voltage (20 kV) for this distance did not suffice to stretch the jet enough to decrease the fiber diameter [25,26].No bead formation was observed at any distance.The diameter distribution became narrower with an increase in distance, indicating a better uniformity of the fiber diameter.The most uniform fiber diameter deposition was observed for samples prepared at 14 cm.As compared to fibers fabricated using identical process parameters for 25G and 14 cm NCD, the fiber diameter was observed to increase when a 22G needle was used.This increase was attributed to the larger drop formed at the needle tip due to the increased needle diameter.The applied voltage was high enough to create a charge that overcame surface tension, along with the optimal viscoelasticity of the polymer solution, preventing bead formation.

Effect of Needle Gauge and NCD
As mentioned earlier, the needle gauge was changed to 22G for optimized electrospinning process parameters (deduced from the results discussed above) and solution concentrations of 80 wt% PVP10000 and 50 wt% PVP55000.The needle tip-to-collector distance (NCD) was varied between 12 cm and 16 cm to observe the variation in fiber morphology.
Figure 12 shows the SEM images and their corresponding diameter distributions for the samples prepared using 80 wt% PVP10000 at three NCDs (12 cm, 14 cm, and 16 cm) at 20 kV and 0.5 mL/h, using a 22G needle.
Figure 12.SEM micrographs of samples prepared using a 22G needle at 12 cm, 14 cm, and 16 cm at 20 kV, 0.5 mL/h, using 80 wt% PVP10000.Average diameters were observed to be 0.349 ± 0.118 µm, 0.297 ± 0.089 µm, and 0.341 ± 0.091 µm for 12 cm, 14 cm, and 16 cm NCD, respectively.It was observed that by increasing the distance from 12 cm to 14 cm, the fiber diameter tended to decrease.This trend is associated with the stretching of the fiber jet for longer NCD, which led to the decrease in the fiber diameter.However, at 16 cm, the fiber diameter increased to 0.341 ± Figure 12.SEM micrographs of samples prepared using a 22G needle at 12 cm, 14 cm, and 16 cm at 20 kV, 0.5 mL/h, using 80 wt% PVP 10000 .
When the PVP 55000 solution was used for electrospinning using a 22G needle at different distances (12 cm, 14 cm, and 16 cm), a significantly high bead density was observed.The variation in distance or lower flow rate for this concentration did not assist in decreasing the bead formation.This occurred due to the wider diameter of the 22G needle (0.413 mm).The larger drop formation resisted the applied voltage to overcome the surface tension, which led to the formation of large beads.Given that the spinning solution demonstrated no bead density when electrospun with a 25G (0.260 mm) needle, it can be inferred that the solution parameters were suitable for this needle gauge.However, in order to prevent bead formation when utilizing a 22G needle, additional optimization of the solution concentration is necessary.It worth mentioning that the same results were observed for all the distances; therefore, the representative SEM micrographs for these samples have been shown in Figure 13.Increasing the concentration of PVP 55000 may lead to a decrease in bead formation when using a smaller needle gauge.
it can be inferred that the parameters were suitable for this needle gauge.However, in order to prevent bead formation when utilizing a 22G needle, additional optimization of the solution concentration is necessary.It worth mentioning that the same results were observed for all the distances; therefore, the representative SEM micrographs for these samples have been shown in Figure 13.Increasing the concentration of PVP55000 may lead to a decrease in bead formation when using a smaller needle gauge.

Conclusions
This study successfully optimized the process parameters for producing electrospun fibers of PVP with lower molecular weights of 10,000 g/mol and 55,000 g/mol.It was found that a polymer with a lower molecular weight necessitates a higher polymer concentration to achieve the optimal viscosity for fiber production.Fiber ejection depends significantly on the higher viscoelasticity of the solution; therefore, preparation of the solution is a crucial step to prepare smooth, bead-free fibers.Moreover, it was observed that an increase in flow rate can lead to an increase in fiber diameter; however, the influence of flow rate at higher voltages is negligible.If the viscoelasticity of the solution and the applied charge density on the solution drop are not high enough to overcome the surface tension, bead formation is observed, especially at a higher flow rate, as observed for 50 wt% PVP55000.Same observation was made when the needle gauge was reduced (the inner diameter of the needle increased).To prepare thinner fibers, a lower molecular weight is observed to be ideal.There are some polymers that hold great potential for drug delivery;

Conclusions
This study successfully optimized the process parameters for producing electrospun fibers of PVP with lower molecular weights of 10,000 g/mol and 55,000 g/mol.It was found that a polymer with a lower molecular weight necessitates a higher polymer concentration to achieve the optimal viscosity for fiber production.Fiber ejection depends significantly on the higher viscoelasticity of the solution; therefore, preparation of the solution is a crucial step to prepare smooth, bead-free fibers.Moreover, it was observed that an increase in flow rate can lead to an increase in fiber diameter; however, the influence of flow rate at higher voltages is negligible.If the viscoelasticity of the solution and the applied charge density on the solution drop are not high enough to overcome the surface tension, bead formation is observed, especially at a higher flow rate, as observed for 50 wt% PVP 55000 .Same observation was made when the needle gauge was reduced (the inner diameter of the needle increased).To prepare thinner fibers, a lower molecular weight is observed to be ideal.There are some polymers that hold great potential for drug delivery; however, their lower molecular weights hinder the fiber formation.The main objective of this research was to enhance the electrospinning process conditions in order to produce smooth bead-free fibers using a polymer with a lower molecular weight.It can be inferred that this objective has been successfully met.Another aim of this study was to explore the underlying principles of the electrospinning process variables that influence fiber morphology.This research effectively examined the combined and individual impacts of various electrospinning process parameters on the fiber structure.The findings of this study will aid in comprehending the basic principles necessary to optimize process parameters for the creation of fibers from these types of polymers.

Future Work
A thorough investigation will be conducted to analyze and correlate the viscosity of the spinning solution (as a function of concentration and molecular weight) in a systematic manner.To further investigate how different electrospinning process parameters impact composite formation, the plan is to encapsulate carbon nanotubes (CNTs) within PVP fibers using a uniaxial electrospinning system.The study will aim to assess the potential of CNTs embedded in PVP fibers for microwave absorption applications.Additionally, the impact of using higher voltages (>25 kV) in producing PVP fibers and CNTs/PVP composite fibers will be examined to understand how voltage affects their morphology and, consequently, their transport properties (such as electrical and thermal characteristics).This fundamental research will also assist in optimizing process parameters for other polymers (like poly vinyl alcohol) with lower molecular weights that will be utilized in future studies.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Ball-and-stick model of PVP molecular structure.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Ball-and-stick model of PVP molecular structure.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. SEM micrographs and fiber diameter distribution graphs of samples prepared with 70 wt% PVP10000 solution at 14 cm NCD and 0.5 mL/h flow rate.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. SEM micrographs and fiber diameter distribution graphs of samples prepared with 70 wt% PVP 10000 solution at 14 cm NCD and 0.5 mL/h flow rate.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.SEM micrographs and fiber diameter distribution graphs of samples prepared wi wt% PVP10000 solution at 14 cm NCD and 0.5 mL/h flowrate.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.SEM micrographs and fiber diameter distribution graphs of samples prepared with 80 wt% PVP 10000 solution at 14 cm NCD and 0.5 mL/h flowrate.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. SEM micrographs of samples prepared using 50 wt% PVP 55000 at 14 cm NCD and 0.5 mL/h flow rate.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. SEM micrographs of samples prepared using 50 wt% PVP55000 at 14 cm NCD and 1.0 mL/h flow rate.

Figure 10 .
Figure10.Graphical representation for the effect of flow rate on average fiber diameter; samples prepared using 50 PVP 55000 , 14 cm NCD, and 25G needle.

Figure 11 .
Figure11.Graphical representation depicts variation in average diameter as a function of applied voltage for samples prepared at 0.5 mL/h using different concentrations (wt%) and PVP molecular weights.

Table 1 .
Electrospinning process parameters used for different concentrations of PVP 10000 and PVP 55000 .

Table 2 .
Electrospinning process parameters used to study the effect of needle gauge and needle-tocollector distance (NCD) on fiber morphology.